Key Points
- Sir Dickson questions why 2Baba chose to remarry Natasha. He recalls past claims that the singer cannot keep one partner.
- The host says the star enjoys wide choice with many women. He wonders why someone like that would still seek marriage vows.
- Online users split between praising his blunt view and defending the singer. The debate widens long questions about open love, vows and fame.
Media host Sir Dickson has joined fresh talk on 2Baba. He raised sharp questions after the singer remarried lawmaker Natasha Osawaru. His post on X sparked debate about vows, choice and truth.
In his note, the commentator said he still felt confused. He recalled long claims that the star could not keep one partner. Those past words, in his view, clash with the new home.
Dickson spoke as more voices weigh in on the fresh union. Earlier, activist Maryam Laushi mocked the move in a Maryam Laushi viral mock post. She said he left a kind wife for stress and noise.
Dickson questions fresh marriage move
In his latest post, Dickson said he could never understand the choice. He recalled past chats where the hit maker said one woman felt impossible. The star had framed his life as open, wild and free.
For Dickson, that history makes the new vows hard to read. He wrote that if the singer wanted casual links, he could stay single. To him, honest choice would keep romance and wedding lines far apart.
He also painted a bold picture of the star’s pull with women. In his view, women from every local council would line up. He said fame and talent already give the singer near endless choice.
So his key question stayed sharp and simple in the thread. What did the groom see in the lawmaker that changed his stand. He asked why someone who rejects commitment would still enter a fresh marriage.
Online reactions split over his stance
Screenshots of the post spread fast across X and Instagram pages. Some users hailed the host for saying what many only whisper offline. They argued that new vows after open talk feel unfair and unsafe.
Others pushed back and said the singer has the right to choose again. They reminded critics that partners may still grow, learn and change minds. For them, outsiders should not judge a bond built behind closed doors.
Many comments also linked Dickson’s view to wider talk on the couple’s fights. Recent posts, including a Kemi Olunloyo harsher marriage story, paint the home as tense. Fans say each fresh claim adds strain to a fragile blended family.
Before Dickson’s post, a brother to the singer had begged for calm online. He urged people to give the house space to heal and breathe. The plea followed a string of videos and claims about heated scenes.
Celebrity marriages under constant public watch
The star’s marriage story has run for years with his first wife Annie. Past reports told of hurt, healing, and many attempts to stay together. More recent posts show her sharing firm quotes about worth and soft love.
The switch from that long story to the lawmaker wife still feels abrupt. It has fed claims that fame makes some men treat vows like trends. Yet others argue such moves reflect complex private pain and search for peace.
Dickson’s angle sits somewhere between moral warning and hard headed realism. He does not shame open life, but he rejects half hearted vows. For him, a ring should signal choice, not vague hope or fear.
The wider case also raises questions about how we watch famous homes. Social media now turns every fight, hug or look into public debate. Fans battle in comments while real people nurse tears off screen.
At this report time, the singer had not replied to Dickson. He has instead asked fans to calm down and give space. Whether the new vows bring long joy or more storms remains unclear.
