Key Points
- Peter Okoye says new EFCC court report is false. He calls it jokes and propaganda in fresh social posts.
- The earlier story claimed EFCC lacked proof of $800,000 withdrawal. Peter insists no such court session held on that day.
- He warns fans that social media cannot act as judge. The fraud case with brothers Jude and Paul still continues.
Singer Peter Okoye, known as Mr P, has pushed back against a new court story. The report said the EFCC lacked proof in his fraud claim. He now says that story is wrong from start to finish.
On X, Mr P wrote the words, “Jokes and propaganda.” He told a fan the viral writeup was not true at all. His posts came after ValidUpdates covered the EFCC rejects Mr P claim report.
In a follow up Story, he shared a longer green slide. He said some people were pushing false stories about a court date. Peter stressed that no such hearing took place on that day.
How the EFCC case began
The dispute goes back to a 2024 petition Peter filed with EFCC. He claimed Jude and Paul moved money from their shared company account. He also said they hid many bank accounts from his view.
At the heart of the case is a claimed $800,000 withdrawal. Peter says that money was taken from Northside Entertainment’s company funds. He further linked the row to forty seven supposed bank accounts.
Reports from court last week painted a different picture for readers. EFCC lawyer Mohammed Bashir told Justice Rahman Oshodi they had no proof. He said the records for the $800,000 were not with them.
What the court report claimed
Bashir was also quoted as denying any file on forty seven accounts. He said those bank details came only from a witness in the case. Defence lawyers went further and showed Corporate Affairs Commission records in court.
Those papers, they argued, did not match Peter’s share claims at all. He had spoken of an eighty percent stake in the business. The CAC documents, they said, told a much smaller share story.
The first ValidUpdates story summed up those claims from both sides. It showed how the EFCC remarks raised fresh doubts around the case. Peter’s latest replies now try to pull that frame back again.
Mr P says story is fake
In his new green slide, Peter warned against trial by timeline. He said some folks were feeding the press with cooked up notes. The goal, he claimed, was simply to make him look bad.
He reminded fans that social media is not the real judge. According to him, only the court can decide what is true here. He ended with a sharp tag that asked, “Una thief or no thief.”
The clash has again split fans of the former P Square group. Some think Peter went too far by dragging his brothers to EFCC. Others say he is right to chase clear info on shared money.
Recent stories on ValidUpdates show how stars now fight online claims in court. Singer Mr Eazi, for instance, sued an X user over a harsh health claim. That story is set out in the Mr Eazi sues X user story.
For now, Peter has not shared new court dates with fans. The fraud case against Jude and Paul still sits before the Lagos court. His latest posts suggest he plans to keep talking as hearings move on.
