- Edo Assembly gave Natasha one week to appear. The Ethics committee will report back in two weeks.
- The summon follows a viral video of a public dispute. Lawmakers say her actions hurt the House image.
- 2Baba (Innocent Idibia) and Natasha drew wide social attention. Many fans and politicians offered mixed reactions online.
The Edo State House of Assembly issued a formal summon. 2Baba (Innocent Idibia) is Natasha’s husband and a star. The lawmaker represents Egor constituency in Edo State.
Speaker Blessing Agbebaku raised the matter during plenary. He said her conduct dragged the House into bad light. He ordered the Ethics and Privileges Committee to investigate.
The panel has one week to summon and question her. ValidUpdates earlier ran claims Natasha blocks music moves on related claims. The committee must submit findings within two weeks.
Lawmakers stressed members must keep public respect and calm. They said high office carries extra public scrutiny. The House will not ignore conduct that causes embarrassment.
The summon follows viral clips that trended across platforms. Fans debated the clips and raised many sharp complaints. See more in Annie Idibia shares firm quote about the wider saga.
Hon. Natasha Irobosa has not yet issued a public reply. Her office did not answer calls or messages today. Her allies have posted mixed statements on social feeds.
Some online accounts show extra clips from the incident. Those clips added more context and raised fresh questions. Journalists are seeking clearer records from airport and police.
What the Assembly says
The Speaker framed the matter as a House image issue. He asked members to uphold decorum and respect always. The panel will examine video clips and witness accounts.
The Ethics committee can call witnesses and request footage. It may also invite police to provide relevant records. The House aims to finish the probe within two weeks.
Public reaction and context
The viral video sparked heated debate across social platforms. Fans split between defence and sharp criticism of her actions. Some posts sought calm and urged privacy for the family.
A few commentators questioned whether the row was private. Others said public office holders must avoid public fights. The debate shows how private matters can become public quickly.
The case adds pressure on both the lawmaker and singer. It may affect public views of their roles and duties. Political opponents could use the matter in future debates.
What happens next
The committee will call Natasha to give her account.
She must explain the context of the video clips. The panel can suggest sanctions if misconduct is proven.
If the panel finds grounds it can recommend penalties. Those penalties may include censure or temporary suspension. Any action will return to the full House for vote.
Journalists will follow the committee and report the outcome. The Assembly asked for calm until the probe ends. Citizens and fans await the committee’s formal written report.
This case shows private life can quickly affect public duty. Lawmakers face extra scrutiny when they act in public places. The committee’s findings will shape the matter’s next steps.
