Key points
- Mr Blord says the website is live and monetised. He hints at earnings from views on uploaded clips.
- Shared screenshots show rising traffic on the new domain. A tech handler plans to upgrade server capacity.
- He teases that critics cannot report the content. More videos will be added in coming days.
Mr Blord announced a new website for VeryDarkMan’s videos. He says the platform is live and built to earn income. He also joked that no one can report the site.
He shared the domain vdmxvideos.net on his Stories. Chats with a tech aide show high traffic and upgrades. The launch follows the BLord Instagram account disappearance.
Traffic and monetisation
Screenshots suggest fast growth in visits within hours of the reveal. A handler says he is scaling the server to take the load. The goal, he adds, is smooth play for each clip.
Mr Blord also stressed that the site is monetised. He plans to upload more videos when time allows. That line hints at a steady pipeline of content.
The model is plain: web ads and on-site views. He says views now pay him for past viral clips. This push shifts the focus from social pages to a hub.
He frames the plan as simple online business for a niche. Viewers get one hub for all clips from the saga. He keeps control of edits, captions, and upload times.
Early screenshots show tabs for trending, popular, and playlists. That layout helps new users find key videos fast. It also supports longer play sessions per visit.
Reactions and context
The reveal follows weeks of back-and-forth between both men. Fans first saw tests on Stories before links rolled out. Some call it smart, while others question the aim.
VDM has lately shared calm notes on his values. He tied quick rise to honesty in a recent post. See the VDM integrity claim post for his words.
Others warn that paywalls may cut reach in the short term. Yet a domain gives control over rules and revenue. Time will show if the traffic holds beyond launch day.
Supporters say the move turns pressure into profit. They cite the clip strikes on his social pages. A site, they argue, avoids quick flags and bans.
Critics still worry about data rules and consent. They ask if uploads clear rights on each face shown. Both sides will watch how he handles such claims
